In partnership with
Your competitors are already automating. Here's the data.
Retail and ecommerce teams using AI for customer service are resolving 40-60% more tickets without more staff, cutting cost-per-ticket by 30%+, and handling seasonal spikes 3x faster.
But here's what separates winners from everyone else: they started with the data, not the hype.
Gladly handles the predictable volume, FAQs, routing, returns, order status, while your team focuses on customers who need a human touch. The result? Better experiences. Lower costs. Real competitive advantage. Ready to see what's possible for your business?
Hey, josh here. With the rocket ship growth that was 2025 for A.I the ethics debate heated up. here are just some highlights.
AI Ethics, Safety, and Societal Debates Intensify
Ethical concerns and calls for “responsible AI” reached new heights in 2025. As AI systems became more powerful and prevalent, so did incidents of bias, misinformation, and other harms. Researchers documented a sharp rise in AI-related incidents and failures, from biased facial recognition and wrongful arrests to chatbots generating false or toxic outputshai.stanford.edu.
This fueled a global debate about how to ensure AI is safe, fair, and trustworthy. Tech companies responded by investing in AI safety research – for example, new benchmark tests for AI factual accuracy and harmful behavior were developedhai.stanford.edu, and leading firms like Google touted that their latest models underwent the most rigorous red-team evaluations yetblog.google. Still, critics argued these voluntary measures aren’t enough. In 2025, prominent AI experts (and even some AI pioneers) continued warning about long-term risks, including open letters urging work on AI alignment to prevent future superintelligent systems from spiraling out of control.
The year also saw mounting legal and moral battles over AI’s impact on society. A wave of lawsuits hit AI developers over intellectual property – for instance, authors and artists sued companies for using copyrighted data in training sets, and Adobe faced a class-action suit for allegedly scraping creators’ works to train its AIcrescendo.ai. Concerns over deepfakes and misinformation spiked as well, especially with major elections on the horizon.
By 2025, all 50 U.S. states had some law addressing deepfakestheregreview.org, and new federal and state statutes began imposing penalties for malicious forgeries and unauthorized AI use of likenessescrowell.com. Bias and fairness in AI remained hot topics, with studies showing AI systems can still discriminate based on race or gender, leading to calls for stricter oversight in hiring, lending, and law enforcement uses.
On the positive side, “AI for good” initiatives gained steam – many universities and NGOs launched programs to use AI for social causes (like healthcare in underserved areas), emphasizing ethical design. Overall, the ethics of AI moved from an abstract discussion to concrete action in 2025, as society grappled with how to harness AI’s benefits while minimizing its harms.