Now through the end of the year is prime streaming time on Roku, with viewers spending 3.5 hours each day streaming content and shopping online. Roku Ads Manager simplifies campaign setup, lets you segment audiences, and provides real-time reporting. And, you can test creative variants and run shoppable ads to drive purchases directly on-screen.

Bonus: we’re gifting you $5K in ad credits when you spend your first $5K on Roku Ads Manager. Just sign up and use code GET5K. Terms apply.

Use code GET5K now

Here's the thing about competitive narratives in tech: they're usually built on cherry-picked metrics that tell half the story. The recent claims about Google's Gemini "rapidly catching up" to ChatGPT? Classic example.

Let's break down what's actually happening.

Yes, Gemini hit #1 on Apple's App Store in September 2025 after launching its viral "Nano Banana" image editing feature—12.6 million downloads that month, a 45% surge. Yes, users now spend an average of 7.2 minutes per session with Gemini versus 6 minutes with ChatGPT. And yes, Gemini overtook ChatGPT in Android installs back in late April 2025.

All verified. All accurate.

But here's the kicker: these metrics are hiding the actual competitive picture.

While Gemini users spend longer per session, ChatGPT users come back 2.2x more often—12.74 visits per user versus Gemini's 5.73. That frequency gap matters enormously for building habit-forming products and long-term monetization.

The scale differential is even more revealing. ChatGPT maintains 190.6 million daily active users compared to Gemini's 35 million. That's a 5.4x advantage in people actually using these tools every single day. On the web, where users have genuine choice, ChatGPT commands 74% of chatbot traffic versus Gemini's 12.9%.

Google's real weapon isn't superior AI—it's distribution at scale. Gemini comes pre-installed on 2+ billion Android devices. It's baked into Google Search, Gmail, Workspace, and YouTube. When you're the default assistant on your own operating system, download numbers tell you more about convenience than preference.

The data backs this up: when Gemini became Android's default assistant in August 2025, usage of the OS overlay increased while standalone app downloads dropped 20%. Users were defaulting, not choosing.

Google figured out how to leverage its ecosystem to distribute AI at unprecedented scale. Gemini went from 90 million to 650 million monthly active users in twelve months—that growth is real and impressive. The viral Nano Banana feature proved Google can still create product moments that capture attention.

But when you look at intentional usage patterns—people deliberately opening an AI assistant to solve problems—ChatGPT remains dominant. Higher retention (89% among paying subscribers), more frequent visits, and far more weekly minutes spent on the platform.

The competition has genuinely intensified. Sam Altman's reported "code red" directive in December 2025 reflects legitimate pressure from Gemini 3's benchmark performance. Google is winning specific battles in downloads and viral moments.

But framing this as parity or reversal? That misses the story. The real question isn't whether Gemini is catching up—it's whether forced distribution can eventually create genuine product preference. The data suggests we're not there yet.