Exxon and Chevron Have an Unlikely New Competitor
Energy giants like Exxon and Chevron are buying land in America’s lithium hotspot. Now they’ve got a new neighbor. EnergyX has now acquired 35k gross acres in Southwest Arkansas, right next door. With tech that can recover 3X more lithium than traditional methods, they’re aiming for America’s lithium crown. General Motors already invested. Join them and 40k people as an early-stage EnergyX investor today.
Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (“EnergyX”) has engaged Nice News to publish this communication in connection with EnergyX’s ongoing Regulation A offering. Nice News has been paid in cash and may receive additional compensation. Nice News and/or its affiliates do not currently hold securities of EnergyX.
This compensation and any current or future ownership interest could create a conflict of interest. Please consider this disclosure alongside EnergyX’s offering materials. EnergyX’s Regulation A offering has been qualified by the SEC. Offers and sales may be made only by means of the qualified offering circular. Before investing, carefully review the offering circular, including the risk factors. The offering circular is available at invest.energyx.com/.
The Race to Put AI Data Centers in Space
Remember when building a data center meant finding cheap land and reliable electricity? Those days might be ending. Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are now racing to put massive computer servers in orbit, and the reasons are more complicated than you'd think.
What's Really Going On
You've probably seen headlines screaming that Earth's power grid can't handle AI anymore. That's not exactly true. The real problem is more boring: we have enough electricity, but getting it to the right places takes forever.
Take Northern Virginia, home to the world's biggest data center hub. Want to build there now? You're waiting seven years just for the power hookup. Not because there's no electricity, but because adding new transmission lines requires permits, approvals, and construction that moves at government speed.
SpaceX and Blue Origin see an opportunity here. While everyone else fights over power permits, they're planning to launch data centers into space where solar panels work 24/7 and nobody needs permission from the local utility company.
The Money Part Actually Makes Sense
Here's where it gets interesting. Launching stuff into space used to cost a fortune—think $60,000 per kilogram on the old Space Shuttle. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets dropped that to around $3,000. Their new Starship aims for just $66-$100 per kilogram.
That's the kind of cost reduction that changes everything. Suddenly, putting computers in orbit doesn't sound completely insane.
Musk has a huge advantage here. SpaceX already has thousands of Starlink satellites up there, meaning the communication network exists. They're building the rockets. They own xAI, an AI company. It's like owning the highway, the gas stations, and the car company all at once.
Bezos is playing catch-up with Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket and building his own orbital data center team, but he's starting further behind.
The Parts Nobody Talks About
This is where the hype train derails a bit. Space might be cold, but cooling computers up there is actually way harder than on Earth.
On the ground, you can use air conditioning and water. In space, heat can only escape through radiation, which is painfully slow. The International Space Station uses only about 75-90 kilowatts of power and needs massive radiator panels just to stay cool. A real data center would need a million times more cooling capacity.
Nobody has figured out how to build radiators that big yet. When Nvidia's CEO was asked about space data centers, he called them "a dream"—and not in a good way.
There's also the radiation problem. Space is full of particles that fry electronics. Making computer chips that survive up there costs extra money and reduces performance.
When Will This Actually Happen?
Musk says space-based AI will be cheaper than Earth-based within 4-5 years. Most experts roll their eyes at that timeline. Google is targeting 2027 just for test satellites. Everyone else is talking about the 2030s.
The technical challenges are real. Launch costs need to drop further. Those massive radiators need inventing. Regulations need writing. And all of this needs to happen at the same time for the economics to work.
The Honest Take
Yes, billionaires are seriously competing to put AI computers in space. Yes, real money and engineering effort are going into this. But no, it's not happening next year, and Earth's power grid isn't "too weak"—it's just slow to expand.
This is a long-term bet on solving multiple hard problems simultaneously. It might pay off spectacularly in 15 years, or it might turn out that upgrading power lines was easier all along.

