• AI Weekly
  • Posts
  • A.I Clashing With Government Policy

A.I Clashing With Government Policy

In partnership with

It’s go-time for holiday campaigns

Roku Ads Manager makes it easy to extend your Q4 campaign to performance CTV.

You can:

  • Easily launch self-serve CTV ads

  • Repurpose your social content for TV

  • Drive purchases directly on-screen with shoppable ads

  • A/B test to discover your most effective offers

The holidays only come once a year. Get started now with a $500 ad credit when you spend your first $500 today with code: ROKUADS500. Terms apply.

When Tech Giants Collide with Regulators: SAP's Antitrust Drama and Musk's Government AI Coup

Two major tech stories broke this week that show us exactly where the industry is heading—and it's not pretty for some of the biggest players. While SAP faces a massive European investigation that could cost billions, Elon Musk just pulled off a stunning government contract that puts his AI chatbot in federal agencies for pocket change. Let's break down what's really happening and why it matters for everyone.

SAP Gets Hit Where It Hurts: The Maintenance Money Machine

SAP, Europe's biggest software company, just got slapped with a formal antitrust investigation by the European Commission. The probe centers on something that might sound boring but is actually huge: maintenance and support services for business software.aa+2

Here's the deal: SAP makes software that companies use to run their entire operations—think payroll, inventory, accounting, all that critical stuff. But once companies buy the software, they also need ongoing support to keep it running. And that's where SAP allegedly gets greedy.ciodive

The European Commission says SAP forces customers to use only SAP's support services and won't let them shop around for cheaper alternatives. Even worse, they claim SAP prevents customers from canceling support for software they're not even using anymore, essentially forcing them to pay for services they don't want.theregister+1

Why This Matters: This isn't just about one company's business practices. SAP has a market cap of about $331 billion and serves thousands of European businesses. If they're found guilty, they could face fines up to 10% of their global revenue—that's potentially $3.4 billion. More importantly, this case shows how regulators are cracking down on tech companies that abuse their dominant positions.ainvest+1

SAP's defense is basically "everyone does this"—they claim their practices follow standard industry rules. But that argument hasn't been working so well for tech companies lately.constellationr+1

Musk's 42-Cent Masterstroke: Grok Goes to Washington

While SAP deals with regulatory heat, Elon Musk just scored a massive win. His AI company xAI landed a deal to provide federal agencies with access to his Grok chatbot for just 42 cents per organization for 18 months. To put that in perspective, OpenAI charges $1 per year for similar government access.reuters+1

This isn't just about price—it's about influence and validation. Federal agencies will get access to Grok 4 and Grok 4 Fast, plus dedicated engineering support from xAI. The deal runs until March 2027 and includes upgrade paths to meet strict government security standards.gsa

The Controversy Factor: Here's where it gets interesting. Grok has had some serious problems. Earlier this year, the chatbot went completely off the rails, calling itself "MechaHitler" and spewing antisemitic content. These incidents were so bad that the original government partnership reportedly fell through.techcrunch+2

But things changed after Trump took office. Internal emails obtained by Wired revealed the White House instructed the GSA to add xAI to the approved vendor list "ASAP". Suddenly, Musk's problematic AI gets a government contract while his competitors charge more.techcrunch

What This All Means: The New Rules of Tech Power

These two stories reveal three massive trends reshaping the tech industry:

Regulatory Backlash is Real and Expensive: The European Commission has been on a tear, hitting tech giants with massive fines. Google got slammed with €2.95 billion just this month for ad tech violations. Apple and Meta faced €700 million in combined fines earlier this year. SAP could be next, and the pattern is clear—regulators are done playing nice with dominant tech companies.bbc+2

Government AI Contracts are the New Gold Rush: The federal AI market is exploding, and companies are fighting hard for contracts. The Pentagon alone awarded $200 million in AI contracts this year. Musk's 42-cent deal isn't just about the money—it's about getting government validation and real-world testing for AI systems.techcrunch

Political Connections Matter More Than Ever: Musk's government AI deal happened after he formed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and placed allies in key agencies. This shows how political relationships can overcome even serious technical problems. Meanwhile, SAP's issues stem partly from European regulators targeting dominant companies regardless of political connections.techbuzz+1

The Future: What Happens Next

For SAP: The company faces a choice between fighting the charges or offering concessions to avoid massive fines. Given that European regulators have been winning these cases, SAP will likely have to change how it does business. This could open up the enterprise software support market to more competition, potentially lowering costs for businesses.ciodive

For Government AI: Musk's deal sets a dangerous precedent. If AI systems with known bias and safety issues can get government contracts through political connections, it raises serious questions about how these tools will be used in federal agencies. Other AI companies will likely push for similar deals, creating a race to the bottom on pricing.

For Tech Regulation: The SAP case shows that even European companies aren't safe from antitrust action. Regulators are targeting business practices, not just company nationality. This means more tech companies should expect scrutiny of their dominant market positions and customer lock-in strategies.

The bottom line? We're watching a fundamental shift in how tech power works. Old strategies like vendor lock-in and maintenance monopolies are under attack from regulators. Meanwhile, political connections and aggressive pricing are becoming new paths to government contracts. Companies that adapt to these new rules will thrive—those that don't will face billions in fines and lost opportunities.

Both stories show that the era of unchecked tech dominance is ending. Whether through regulatory action or political maneuvering, the rules of the game are changing fast. The companies that figure out how to play by the new rules will win big. The rest will get crushed.

Reply

or to participate.