In partnership with

Find your customers on Roku this Black Friday

As with any digital ad campaign, the important thing is to reach streaming audiences who will convert. To that end, Roku’s self-service Ads Manager stands ready with powerful segmentation and targeting options. After all, you know your customers, and we know our streaming audience.

Worried it’s too late to spin up new Black Friday creative? With Roku Ads Manager, you can easily import and augment existing creative assets from your social channels. We also have AI-assisted upscaling, so every ad is primed for CTV.

Once you’ve done this, then you can easily set up A/B tests to flight different creative variants and Black Friday offers. If you’re a Shopify brand, you can even run shoppable ads directly on-screen so viewers can purchase with just a click of their Roku remote.

Bonus: we’re gifting you $5K in ad credits when you spend your first $5K on Roku Ads Manager. Just sign up and use code GET5K. Terms apply.

Use code GET5K now

Hey, josh here. check this story out!

Apple's $1B Google Deal and What Jensen Huang Gets That Washington Doesn't

Here's a wild stat: Apple is about to pay Google $1 billion annually to power Siri with Gemini AI. The same Apple that already receives $20 billion per year from Google to keep it as Safari's default search engine.

Let me break down why this matters way more than just another tech partnership.

The Deal Apple Didn't Want to Make

Apple spent years promising a smarter Siri. They announced features at WWDC 2024 for iOS 18, then quietly pushed everything to 2026. Why? Because executives admitted internally that their AI "did not work reliably enough to be an Apple product."

So they went shopping. OpenAI? Too expensive and already integrated as a chatbot feature. Anthropic? Wanted $1.5 billion. Google came in at $1 billion for a custom 1.2 trillion parameter Gemini model—roughly 8x more powerful than Apple's current cloud model.

The kicker? This custom Gemini will run on Apple's Private Cloud Compute servers, handling only specific tasks like summarization and multi-step planning. Apple keeps the rest in-house, maintaining that privacy narrative while borrowing Google's brain for the hard stuff. And they're not planning to tell users about it—no "Powered by Google" badge on your iPhone.

Apple positions this as temporary, claiming they'll build their own trillion-parameter model eventually. But here's what this really reveals: even the most cash-rich company in history hit a wall on AI capabilities and had to license externally. Self-reliance has its limits when you're racing against models that took thousands of engineers and billions in compute to develop.

What Jensen Huang Actually Said

Meanwhile, on November 5th, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang told the Financial Times that "China is going to win the AI race." NVIDIA stock immediately dropped 1.75%, wiping out $80 billion in market cap. Hours later, he clarified on social media: "China is nanoseconds behind America in AI."

Classic damage control, right? Except Huang's underlying argument didn't change—he just repositioned defeat as avoidable rather than inevitable.

His reasoning cuts deep. China has cheap, subsidized energy for data centers. They have 50% of the world's AI researchers. Companies like DeepSeek, Alibaba, and Tencent are producing "world-class" models. Meanwhile, Microsoft literally has GPUs sitting idle because they can't get enough power to run them, and US companies are betting on speculative solutions like small modular reactors that won't exist for years.

Here's where it gets uncomfortable: Huang argues that US export bans on advanced chips backfire. Instead of slowing China down, they incentivize domestic alternatives. Alibaba just unveiled a system that cuts NVIDIA GPU reliance by 82%. China banned foreign chips from state-funded data centers in November 2025. NVIDIA's market share in China went from over 90% to essentially zero.

Huang sees a $50 billion annual opportunity evaporating—and with it, access to half the world's AI talent and developer ecosystem. His point: you can't win a tech race by restricting your opponents' access to your tools while they build their own infrastructure. You win by racing ahead.

The Pattern You Need to See

Connect these stories. Apple couldn't build competitive AI alone, so they partnered with Google. China can't access NVIDIA chips, so they're building domestic alternatives. Both reveal the same truth: sanctions create fragmentation, not dominance.

The US strategy assumes restricting chip exports prevents Chinese AI progress. But we're watching China accelerate AI development despite the restrictions, now with zero dependence on American hardware. We successfully pushed them toward self-reliance—which is exactly what we didn't want.

Apple's pragmatic move to license Gemini shows how actual companies handle capability gaps: they integrate, they partner, they stay competitive. China's taking notes. While Washington adds regulations and export controls, Beijing subsidizes energy and recruits researchers.

Jensen Huang gets what policymakers don't: you can't regulate your way to technological leadership. You build it through infrastructure, talent, and ecosystem advantage. Export bans feel powerful but mostly succeed in creating separate technology stacks—one American, one Chinese—where we lose access to their market, talent, and innovation.

The bipartisan Senate response? Double down on restrictions because China's "inability to access computing power" is our main advantage. They're literally celebrating the gap that's incentivizing China to close it permanently.

Apple needed Google. America needs to recognize that dominance comes from building faster, not from making competitors build slower. We're winning the battle and losing the war.