In partnership with

Stay up-to-date with AI

The Rundown is the most trusted AI newsletter in the world, with 1,000,000+ readers and exclusive interviews with AI leaders like Mark Zuckerberg, Demis Hassibis, Mustafa Suleyman, and more.

Their expert research team spends all day learning what’s new in AI and talking with industry experts, then distills the most important developments into one free email every morning.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

Sign up to start learning.

Denmark's Bold Deepfake Gambit: Owning Your Face in the AI Age

Denmark just dropped what might be the most interesting legal curveball in the AI era: they want to give you copyright over your own face. Yes, you read that right. Under a groundbreaking proposal from Culture Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt, every Danish citizen would essentially own the rights to their physical likeness – their face, voice, and body – in the same way a musician owns their songs.

It's a fascinating approach to the deepfake problem that's been keeping lawmakers up at night. Instead of dancing around privacy laws or creating entirely new regulations, Denmark is essentially saying: "Your face is intellectual property. Deal with it accordingly."

The Copyright Twist Nobody Saw Coming

Here's where it gets interesting. Traditional copyright law protects creative works – your photos, your music, your writing. It doesn't protect you as a person. That's usually the domain of privacy or personality rights. But Denmark is flipping the script entirely.

Under their proposal, creating a deepfake of someone without permission would be treated like pirating a movie. The draft amendment defines deepfakes as "very realistic digital representations" of people, including their appearance and voice. If someone AI-generates your face saying something you never said, you could hit them with what's essentially a DMCA takedown notice.

The mechanics are surprisingly straightforward. Victims could demand platforms remove unauthorized AI-generated content of them. If platforms don't comply, they face "severe fines" and potential EU enforcement action. Unlike criminal approaches, this is civil law – you can sue for damages, but nobody's going to jail.

The Devil in the Details

Of course, there are some obvious tensions here. What about parody? Satire? Political commentary? The Danes seem to have thought this through – they're carving out "strong exceptions" for transformative uses. But anyone who's spent five minutes thinking about fair use law knows these lines get blurry fast.

The enforcement mechanism is also telling. Denmark is essentially outsourcing policing to the platforms themselves. They're betting that the threat of fines and EU action will be enough to make Meta, TikTok, and others take removal requests seriously. It's a regulatory strategy that's become increasingly common – make the platforms do the heavy lifting.

A European First, But Not Alone

Denmark is calling this the first law of its kind in Europe, and they're probably right. While the EU's AI Act requires labeling of AI-generated content, it doesn't ban it. France and the UK have gone after deepfakes, but mostly focused on non-consensual sexual content with traditional criminal penalties.

What makes Denmark's approach unique is its generality. This isn't just about revenge porn or election interference – it's about any unauthorized use of someone's likeness. In theory, this could cover everything from a fake celebrity endorsement to someone putting your face on a meme.

The political support is remarkable too. Nine out of ten MPs reportedly back the change, suggesting this isn't just political theater. The timeline is ambitious – public consultation this summer, formal proposal in autumn 2025, with potential implementation by year-end.

The Critical Questions

But here's where things get murky. How exactly do you prove ownership of your own face? What happens when someone looks similar to you? How do platforms distinguish between authorized and unauthorized use at scale?

The comparison to DMCA takedowns is instructive – and potentially worrying. The DMCA system is notoriously prone to abuse, with legitimate content regularly taken down by spurious claims. Expanding this to personal likeness could create a censorship nightmare.

There's also the question of proportionality. Yes, deepfakes can be harmful, but is copyright law really the right tool here? Copyright was designed to incentivize creativity by giving creators temporary monopolies over their work. Applying it to personal identity stretches the concept in ways that might have unintended consequences.

Looking Ahead: The Ripple Effects

If this passes, Denmark plans to use its EU Council presidency in late 2025 to push similar measures across Europe. That's where things could get really interesting – or really complicated.

Imagine a continent-wide system where every person essentially owns their face. The implications for AI development, social media, and even traditional media are staggering. Would training an AI model on public images require individual consent from everyone pictured? Would sharing a photo of a friend require permission?

The tech industry's response will be crucial. These companies are already struggling with content moderation at scale. Adding personal likeness claims to the mix could be a nightmare of false positives and legitimate disputes.

The Bigger Picture

Denmark's proposal reflects a broader shift in how we think about identity in the digital age. The traditional boundaries between public and private, between person and property, are blurring. In a world where AI can clone anyone's voice or face with a few seconds of source material, maybe we do need new legal frameworks.

But rushing to treat personal identity like intellectual property might create more problems than it solves. The line between protecting people and restricting legitimate expression is thin, and copyright law isn't exactly known for its nuance.

What's certain is that Denmark is about to become a real-world test case for how we handle AI-generated content. Whether this bold experiment succeeds or crashes and burns, it's going to teach us a lot about the future of identity, technology, and law.

The rest of Europe – and the world – is watching. And what happens next might determine whether we own our faces or our faces own us.